<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://www.simulace.info/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Amelievh</id>
	<title>Simulace.info - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.simulace.info/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Amelievh"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php/Special:Contributions/Amelievh"/>
	<updated>2026-07-27T13:14:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.31.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Wheel.jpg&amp;diff=14443</id>
		<title>File:Wheel.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Wheel.jpg&amp;diff=14443"/>
		<updated>2018-01-24T17:00:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:PDCA.jpg&amp;diff=14442</id>
		<title>File:PDCA.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:PDCA.jpg&amp;diff=14442"/>
		<updated>2018-01-24T16:59:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:HouseofQualities.jpg&amp;diff=14437</id>
		<title>File:HouseofQualities.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:HouseofQualities.jpg&amp;diff=14437"/>
		<updated>2018-01-24T14:22:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:ProcessApproach.jpg&amp;diff=14435</id>
		<title>File:ProcessApproach.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:ProcessApproach.jpg&amp;diff=14435"/>
		<updated>2018-01-24T14:09:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: Example of a process approach to earn the ISO 9001 : 2005&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Example of a process approach to earn the ISO 9001 : 2005&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14167</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14167"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:06:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: Gender Pay Gap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013.  All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap. To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: stockflow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BASE.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TOTALPAYGAP.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ZoomPG.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Education.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EducationZoom.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:PayGapSimulation.zip]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14166</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14166"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:05:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013.  All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap. To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: stockflow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BASE.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TOTALPAYGAP.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ZoomPG.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Education.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EducationZoom.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:PayGapSimulation.zip]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:PayGapSimulation.zip&amp;diff=14165</id>
		<title>File:PayGapSimulation.zip</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:PayGapSimulation.zip&amp;diff=14165"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:04:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:EducationZoom.jpg&amp;diff=14164</id>
		<title>File:EducationZoom.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:EducationZoom.jpg&amp;diff=14164"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:03:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Education.jpg&amp;diff=14163</id>
		<title>File:Education.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Education.jpg&amp;diff=14163"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:03:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:ZoomPG.jpg&amp;diff=14162</id>
		<title>File:ZoomPG.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:ZoomPG.jpg&amp;diff=14162"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:02:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:TOTALPAYGAP.jpg&amp;diff=14161</id>
		<title>File:TOTALPAYGAP.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:TOTALPAYGAP.jpg&amp;diff=14161"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:02:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:BASE.jpg&amp;diff=14160</id>
		<title>File:BASE.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:BASE.jpg&amp;diff=14160"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:02:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Stockflow.jpg&amp;diff=14159</id>
		<title>File:Stockflow.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Stockflow.jpg&amp;diff=14159"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:01:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14158</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14158"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T20:01:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013.  All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap. To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: stockflow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BASE.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TOTALPAYGAP.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ZoomPG.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Education.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EducationZoom.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:PayGapSimulation.zip]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14157</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14157"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:59:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013.  All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap. To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: stockflow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BASE.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TOTALPAYGAP.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ZoomPG.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Education.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EducationZoom.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14156</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14156"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:59:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013.  All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap. To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: stockflow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BASE.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TOTALPAYGAP.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ZoomPG.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Education.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EducationZoom.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14155</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14155"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:58:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013.  All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap. To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: stockflow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BASE.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TOTALPAYGAP.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ZoomPG.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Education.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EducationZoom.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14154</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14154"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:49:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013.  All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap. To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14153</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14153"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:48:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013.  All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap. To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-&lt;br /&gt;
        64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14152</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14152"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:45:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013. &lt;br /&gt;
All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap.&lt;br /&gt;
To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-&lt;br /&gt;
        64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Causaldiagram.jpg&amp;diff=14151</id>
		<title>File:Causaldiagram.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Causaldiagram.jpg&amp;diff=14151"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:45:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: Amelievh uploaded a new version of File:Causaldiagram.jpg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Causaldiagram.jpg&amp;diff=14150</id>
		<title>File:Causaldiagram.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=File:Causaldiagram.jpg&amp;diff=14150"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:44:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14149</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14149"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:43:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:causaldiagram.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013. &lt;br /&gt;
All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap.&lt;br /&gt;
To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work fulltime&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
- Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
- Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: -25 years: 22% / 25-34 years: 74% / 35-44 years: 77% / 45-54 years: 72% / 55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay Gap per age: -25 years: €1,03 / 25-34 years: €0,69 / 35-44 years: €1,61 / 45-54 years: €2,92 / 55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-&lt;br /&gt;
        64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation Rate women: High school: 30% / Bachelor: 59% / Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
- High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap: High school: €1,80 / Bachelor: €2,78 / Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow: Single: 42,66% / Married: 38,03% / Divorced: 9,8% / Widow: 9,5%		&lt;br /&gt;
-Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap single: €-0,34 / Pay gap married: €1,99 / Pay gap divorced: €1,48 / Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Participation rate: Single, no children: 58% / Single with child(ren): 59% / Couple without children: 62% / Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
- Pay gap in euro’s: Single, no children: €-0,65 / Single with child(ren): €0,38 / Couple without children: €2,09 / Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
3. Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
4. Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
5. Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
6. Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
7. Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
8. Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
9. Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
10. Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
1. Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
2. Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
3. Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
1. Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
3. Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
4. Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
5. Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14148</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14148"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:33:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Numbers=&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013. &lt;br /&gt;
All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap.&lt;br /&gt;
To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work full &lt;br /&gt;
        time&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
-	Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Participation rate:&lt;br /&gt;
	-25 years: 22%&lt;br /&gt;
	25-34 years: 74%&lt;br /&gt;
	35-44 years: 77%&lt;br /&gt;
	45-54 years: 72%&lt;br /&gt;
	55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay Gap per age:&lt;br /&gt;
	-25 years: €1,03&lt;br /&gt;
	25-34 years: €0,69&lt;br /&gt;
	35-44 years: €1,61&lt;br /&gt;
	45-54 years: €2,92&lt;br /&gt;
	55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-&lt;br /&gt;
        64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Participation Rate women:&lt;br /&gt;
	High school: 30%&lt;br /&gt;
	Bachelor: 59%&lt;br /&gt;
	Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
-	High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
	High school: €1,80&lt;br /&gt;
	Bachelor: €2,78&lt;br /&gt;
	Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow&lt;br /&gt;
	Single: 42,66%&lt;br /&gt;
	Married: 38,03%&lt;br /&gt;
	Divorced: 9,8%&lt;br /&gt;
	Widow: 9,5%		&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay gap single: €-0,34&lt;br /&gt;
        Pay gap married: €1,99&lt;br /&gt;
        Pay gap divorced: €1,48&lt;br /&gt;
        Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Participation rate:&lt;br /&gt;
	Single, no children: 58%&lt;br /&gt;
	Single with child(ren): 59%&lt;br /&gt;
	Couple without children: 62%&lt;br /&gt;
	Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay gap in euro’s:&lt;br /&gt;
	Single, no children: €-0,65&lt;br /&gt;
	Single with child(ren): €0,38&lt;br /&gt;
	Couple without children: €2,09&lt;br /&gt;
	Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64)&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
7.	Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
8.	Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
9.	Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
10.	Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Resource= &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14147</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14147"/>
		<updated>2018-01-16T19:31:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Project Name: motherhood pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
Class: 4IT496 – Simulation of Systems&lt;br /&gt;
Author: Amélie Van Hoecke&lt;br /&gt;
Model type: System Dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
Software used: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Problem definition=&lt;br /&gt;
The Pay Gap, unequal pay between men and women, is one of the taboos nowadays that the European Union wants to tackle. It’s a difficult problem to solve because it is influenced by many other factors as education, part-time working, families, ... I want to try to solve this problem by researching how the different factors are interrelated with each other and what the best solution is. A simulation in Vensim with real numbers will help me with that. &lt;br /&gt;
For the numbers, I will focus on one country, Belgium, because I found a good source with some good and interesting numbers on this country and it's my home country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Method=&lt;br /&gt;
I chose to work with Vensim, because this problem can be seen as a group of interacting and interdependent problems forming a complex whole. The reasons of the pay gap are caused by other factors etc. This results in a complex whole. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Theoretical background and facts=&lt;br /&gt;
Before I start with the model, I want to explain the background of the problem and discuss some different numbers of the pay gap. There are multiple researches on this topic. The European Commission publishes each year an Annual Report on Gender Equality.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is the difference between men’s and women’s pay, based on average difference in gross hourly earnings of all employees. On average, women in the EU earn around 16% less per hour than men. But it varies from country to country. The gender gap is a complex issue caused by a number of interrelated factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Numbers=&lt;br /&gt;
I had a lot of difficulties with simulating all this information in one model, but finally I found a sollution by separating the different factors. This is possible because each of the findings I used are also split up, so there is no overlap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding totally up-to-date information is not easy, so I took the data found by a report made in 2016 by ‘Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van mannen en vrouwen’, a Belgian institution who fights for equality between Belgian men and women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all we look at the employment rate of that year. This was 57,2% for women and 66,4% for men in 2013. The employment rate gives us the amount of working people between 15 and 64 years old. The reasons for a low employment rate for women is partially caused by the pay gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total pay gap in 2013 was 8,432 billion euros. This amount can be split up by different reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Part-time working.''' &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reasons of part-time working:&lt;br /&gt;
- Childcare: 21%&lt;br /&gt;
- Family reasons: 29%&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t find full-time: 8%&lt;br /&gt;
- In combination with studies, retirement...: 7%&lt;br /&gt;
- Economic reasons: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Health reasons: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Only part-time possibilities: 15%&lt;br /&gt;
- Others: 5%&lt;br /&gt;
- Doesn’t want to work full-time: 9%&lt;br /&gt;
- Working conditions: 0,5%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Age'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related with experience and seniority, and the differences in generations. Older women are lower educated than younger women. &lt;br /&gt;
Wages are increasing with age, for men and women. But the amount of changing depends on the sex. An explanation for this is the evolution of the carreer for men and women. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
the grade of certificate also influence the pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
Family'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Civil state''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Model=&lt;br /&gt;
To get an overview of the different variables, I first made a causal diagram:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2013, Belgium counted 5 676 207 women. I will use this number because the percentages are also from 2013. &lt;br /&gt;
All the data used is completely split up for the sole reason so there is no overlap.&lt;br /&gt;
To see which part of the pay gap is the biggest, I will divide the Gap the different causes of the gap:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Women’s working population = 0.572 * 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by part-time working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Women’s Part-time Rate = 55%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working Part-time = (&amp;quot;Women's part-time Rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population)*(Child Care+Doesn't find fulltime+&amp;quot;doesn't want to work full &lt;br /&gt;
        time&amp;quot;+economic reasons+Family Reasons+health reasons+in combination with studies+&amp;quot;only part-time possibilities&amp;quot;+others+working conditions)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Part-Time working Women = INTEG(Working Part-Time,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay Gap part-time = Gap between Women working part-time and men working part-time = €1&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap caused by Part-Time''' = INTEG(&amp;quot;Part-Time working Women&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;pay gap part-time&amp;quot;,0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Age ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Women population = total population of Women in Belgium in 2013 = 5 676 207&lt;br /&gt;
-	Women’s Employment rate = 57,2%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Participation rate:&lt;br /&gt;
	-25 years: 22%&lt;br /&gt;
	25-34 years: 74%&lt;br /&gt;
	35-44 years: 77%&lt;br /&gt;
	45-54 years: 72%&lt;br /&gt;
	55-64 years: 35%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay Gap per age:&lt;br /&gt;
	-25 years: €1,03&lt;br /&gt;
	25-34 years: €0,69&lt;br /&gt;
	35-44 years: €1,61&lt;br /&gt;
	45-54 years: €2,92&lt;br /&gt;
	55-64 years: €4,85&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay Gap Caused by Age''' = INTEG((&amp;quot;-25&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay Gap -25&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;25-34&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 25-34&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;35-44&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 35-44&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;45-54&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 45-54&amp;quot;)+(&amp;quot;55-&lt;br /&gt;
        64&amp;quot;*&amp;quot;Pay gap 55-64&amp;quot;),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Education ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Participation Rate women:&lt;br /&gt;
	High school: 30%&lt;br /&gt;
	Bachelor: 59%&lt;br /&gt;
	Master: 78%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working after high School = Participation Rate after high school * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working after Bachelor = Participation Rate after bachelor * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working after master  = Participation Rate after master * Women’s working population&lt;br /&gt;
-	High school = INTEG(working after high school,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Bachelor = INTEG(working after bachelor,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Master = INTEG(working after master, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay gap&lt;br /&gt;
	High school: €1,80&lt;br /&gt;
	Bachelor: €2,78&lt;br /&gt;
	Master: €5,33&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Education''': INTEG((Bachelor*pay gap bachelor)+(high school*pay gap high school)+(Master*pay gap master),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Civil State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Percentage of people Single, Married, Divorced or Widow&lt;br /&gt;
	Single: 42,66%&lt;br /&gt;
	Married: 38,03%&lt;br /&gt;
	Divorced: 9,8%&lt;br /&gt;
	Widow: 9,5%		&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working population being single = Single rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working population being married = Married rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working population being divorced = Divorced rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working population being widow = Widow rate*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single = INTEG(working population being single,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Married = INTEG(working population being married,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Divorced = INTEG(working population being divorced,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Widow = INTEG(working population being widow,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay gap single: €-0,34&lt;br /&gt;
        Pay gap married: €1,99&lt;br /&gt;
        Pay gap divorced: €1,48&lt;br /&gt;
        Pay gap widow: €0,63&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Pay gap caused by Civil State''' = INTEG((Single*pay gap single)+(Married*pay gap married)+(Divorced*pay gap divorced)+(Widow*pay gap widow),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pay Gap caused by Family Composition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-	Participation rate:&lt;br /&gt;
	Single, no children: 58%&lt;br /&gt;
	Single with child(ren): 59%&lt;br /&gt;
	Couple without children: 62%&lt;br /&gt;
	Couple with children: 65%&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single working women = &amp;quot;Single, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single working mom = &amp;quot;Single, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working women with husband = &amp;quot;couple, no children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Working Women without husband = &amp;quot;couple, with children participation rate&amp;quot;*Women's working Population&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single, no children = INTEG(single working women,0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Single, with children = INTEG(single working mom, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Couple without children = INTEG(working women with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Couple with children = INTEG(working mom with husband, 0)&lt;br /&gt;
-	Pay gap in euro’s:&lt;br /&gt;
	Single, no children: €-0,65&lt;br /&gt;
	Single with child(ren): €0,38&lt;br /&gt;
	Couple without children: €2,09&lt;br /&gt;
	Couple with children: €2,39&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;gt; '''Total Pay Gap caused by Family Composition''' = INTEG((Single with children*pay gap single mom)+(&amp;quot;Single, no children&amp;quot;*Pay gap single woman)+(Couple with children*pay gap coupled mom)+(Couple without children*pay gap coupled women),0)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Results=&lt;br /&gt;
I first did a simulation of everything how it is set, and we call this ‘Base’. We will use base to compare with the other data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pay gap is increasing with time, but that is not what we are researching. We will look at the differences of the pay gap when changing certain parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
With the function SyntheSim I can now change certain parameters to see the influence of this on the total pay gap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Increase the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%, for every age. For every hourly pay gap of age * 1.1 (-25 years, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-&lt;br /&gt;
        64)&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Decrease the gross hourly pay gap for age with 10%. For every hourly pay gap variable of age * 0,9 in the equation.&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Increase pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Decrease pay gap per hour for part-time with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Increase pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Decrease pay gap per hour for education with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
7.	Increase pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
8.	Decrease pay gap per hour for civil state with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
9.	Increase pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
10.	Decrease pay gap per hour for family composition with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the graphs increase or decrease in the same way and order. But some of them slightly more than the others. The increase and decrease of the pay gap for education has the biggest influence on the total pay gap. If you increase the gross hourly pay gap of this cause, the pay gap increases a lot. Followed by the cause Age. For decreasing we find the same conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To check which of the factors within Education (high school, bachelor, master) has the biggest impact, you change each of the three factors separately:&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Decrease high school pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Decrease Bachelor pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Decrease Master pay gap with 10%&lt;br /&gt;
It is to small to see on this graph, so we zoom in: You see that decreasing the master pay gap has the biggest influence on closing the pay gap. Decreasing high school pay gap has the smallest influence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusion=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can make a top of the best indicators to close the pay gap, to the smallest influencer:&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Pay gap caused by Education: Master – Bachelor – High school&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Pay gap caused by Age&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Pay gap caused by Family Composition&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Pay gap caused by Civil State&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Pay gap caused by Part-time working. &lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to start closing the pay gap for the government, is reducing the pay gap based on education. Especially for master certificates. This can be explained by the low amount of women having a top function. Changing this is a good start for closing the gap. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Code=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Resources: &lt;br /&gt;
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140227_gpg_brochure_web_en.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=5fee32f5-29b0-40df-9fb9-af43d1ac9032&lt;br /&gt;
http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/91_-_de_loonkloof_tussen_vrouwen_en_mannen_2016_nl.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14121</id>
		<title>Gender Pay Gap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Gender_Pay_Gap&amp;diff=14121"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T23:13:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: Created page with &amp;quot;Coming Soon&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Coming Soon&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=14120</id>
		<title>WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=14120"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T23:13:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Semestral papers from winter term 2017/2018. Please, put here links to the pages with your paper. First you need to have your [[Assignments WS 2017/2018|assignment approved]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:feld00|feld00]] ([[User feld00|talk]]) 18:39, 15 January 2018 (CET) [[Evacuation from a custom building]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:A_V|A_V]] ([[User A_V|talk]]) 20:00, 15 January 2018 (CET) [[Hamsters Spawning]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Amelievh|Amelievh]] ([[User talk:Amelievh|talk]]) 00:12, 16 January 2018 (CET) [[Gender Pay Gap]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=14119</id>
		<title>WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=14119"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T23:13:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Semestral papers from winter term 2017/2018. Please, put here links to the pages with your paper. First you need to have your [[Assignments WS 2017/2018|assignment approved]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:feld00|feld00]] ([[User feld00|talk]]) 18:39, 15 January 2018 (CET) [[Evacuation from a custom building]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:A_V|A_V]] ([[User A_V|talk]]) 20:00, 15 January 2018 (CET) [[Hamsters Spawning]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Amelievh|Amelievh]] ([[User talk:Amelievh|talk]]) 00:12, 16 January 2018 (CET)[[Gender Pay Gap]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=14118</id>
		<title>WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=14118"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T23:12:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Semestral papers from winter term 2017/2018. Please, put here links to the pages with your paper. First you need to have your [[Assignments WS 2017/2018|assignment approved]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:feld00|feld00]] ([[User feld00|talk]]) 18:39, 15 January 2018 (CET) [[Evacuation from a custom building]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:A_V|A_V]] ([[User A_V|talk]]) 20:00, 15 January 2018 (CET) [[Hamsters Spawning]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----[[User:Amelievh|Amelievh]] ([[User talk:Amelievh|talk]]) 00:12, 16 January 2018 (CET)[[Gender Pay Gap]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=14117</id>
		<title>WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=14117"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T23:12:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Semestral papers from winter term 2017/2018. Please, put here links to the pages with your paper. First you need to have your [[Assignments WS 2017/2018|assignment approved]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:feld00|feld00]] ([[User feld00|talk]]) 18:39, 15 January 2018 (CET) [[Evacuation from a custom building]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:A_V|A_V]] ([[User A_V|talk]]) 20:00, 15 January 2018 (CET) [[Hamsters Spawning]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Amelievh|Amelievh]] ([[User Amelievh|talk]]) --[[User:Amelievh|Amelievh]] ([[User talk:Amelievh|talk]]) 00:12, 16 January 2018 (CET) [[Gender Pay Gap]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13906</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13906"/>
		<updated>2017-12-15T11:20:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Simulation Proposal (feld00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to simulate a public transport system. The idea came from travelling around Europe, being surprised how often public transport systems fail in large cities and still they are very expensive. Prague public transport is rare exception. Buses, trams and subway trains arrive with minimal deviation from planned arrival time usually in seconds. I believe that there is sophisticated simulation software behind this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to simplify the task let’s presume that it is not about money. We are not going to optimize costs and incomes. The purpose of this simulation is to optimize:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Numbers of transportation units (TU) needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Frequency of releasing TUs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	their arrival time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All stated above in order to prevent people queueing on public transportation stops and to prevent transportation units from crowding.&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft Excel and SimProcess if needed will be used to perform this simulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Please, try to obtain real data. '''Approved'''. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:05, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Social media post (Amelievh) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Simulations on social media are typically problematic, mostly due to the lack of real data. I would recommend to try finding, something else. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:11, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''New proposal: gender pay gap'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is a difficult problem to solve because it is caused by different reasons (education, age, part-time working ...). These are main reasons, but all these reasons are influenced by other aspects and factors.I want to simulate these different reasons + influences in Vensim and work out the most effective solutions to reduce the pay gap. I would specify on 1 country because data is different per country. Easiest and most interesting for me is Belgium.&lt;br /&gt;
:: What particular literature and data will you base it on? [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 12:07, 15 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I wrote a paper on this topic for another course wherefore I found a lot of statistical data. The EU publishes statistical data about this topic and reasons for it. I came up with the idea after seeing the Vensim example of SchoolLife which also showed a lot of influence on your future career. Only googling 'Gender Pay Gap Belgium' give you already a lot of publications and statistical information on this topic. --[[User:Amelievh|Amelievh]] ([[User talk:Amelievh|talk]]) 12:20, 15 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation Proposal (A_V) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We own a zoo. We have a huge kennel for hamsters. We have observed a strange behavior of the hamsters. When a female hamster gives birth to babies (usually up to 12), the mother may come under the pressure of nurturing each and everyone of them. After giving the birth a female hamster becomes weak and may die if does not have enough food and vitamins. Also when the mother is weak, she can not lactate milk for all of her babies. Since the quality of food provided by the zoo does not always satisfy the hamster, the mother eats her weakest babies to get extra protein  to feed other babies, which increases the probability of survival of her and the rest babies. Another reason of the deaths of hamsters, as mentioned above, is the adequate quality of food. If the food does not satisfy the hamsters, they do not eat it and the food rots  by polluting the kernel which leads to an increased number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
In the simulation I will focus on how much the food quality, the amount of food and keeping the kernel clean influences the number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Makes sense, however it is necessary to obtain real data. Implementation of some of them will not be easy. '''Approved'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation proposal (hram00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagine a beach by the ocean guarded by several lifeguards. The warmer the ocean is, the more jellyfish come. If there is a lot of jellyfish in the water, people often get stung. If they get proper treatment in less then five minutes, the pain goes away quickly end they can enjoy the day on the beach. Otherwise they're mad for the rest of the day. In case someone is alergic, the situation can get critical.&lt;br /&gt;
My simulation should serve as a support for decision how many lifeguard should be placed on the beach and how far from each other to provide the best services and ensure the highest satisfaction of people on the beach and make sure no one will die because of jellyfish sting.&lt;br /&gt;
The Simulation will be simplified but based on reality. There are no real data about number of jellyfish in the water but there are data about number of people stung every day. Based on current experience I can make a simulation which is close to reality. So far there is one lifeguard each 200 meters, at the begining of the season when the water is cold 70 F there is 0-2 people stung in one lifeguard's area, in the hot days by the end of the season (water has about 85 F) the numbers of people stung on each lifeguard stand go up to 100 a day and we know there are cases that it took too long to get help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hub airport (yaua00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I study not in my home country I have to use plane quite often to get home and sometimes I have to go to a hub airport and change the plane there. So in my simulation I want to show the phenomenon of hub airports. Hub airports are used by one or more airlines to concentrate passenger traffic and flight operations at a given airport. They serve as transfer (or stop-over) points to get passengers to their final destination. The simulation will start with the certain amount of the airports and airplanes will appear at random locations. Airplanes will find a random airport and fly to it, leaving trails on screen to show their paths. Over time new airport and a new airplane will be built. The airports that have existed for the longest will obviously already have the greatest number of airplanes flying to them, but the goal of the simulation is to see when over some time after new airports are built, if the new airport is going to get more planes and if there is going to be new hub airport.  [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 23:21, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government Policies and Its Influence to Economy (xbilr00)==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to simulate an impact of government decision to a economy. The government will have few tools which can be fully influenced by political decisions (government spending, tax rates etc.). Based on this I will simulate an impact of these decisions to economic indicators (GDP growth, state budget incomes, inflation, state budget saldo etc.). This simulation should reflect a great complexity of each decision and its impact even to indicators which you will not imagine on the first sight.&lt;br /&gt;
::This is very complex - the simulation has to make sense so the question is what particular literature and particular models will you base it on? [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 20:46, 14 December 2017 (CET)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13905</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13905"/>
		<updated>2017-12-15T11:19:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Simulation Proposal (feld00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to simulate a public transport system. The idea came from travelling around Europe, being surprised how often public transport systems fail in large cities and still they are very expensive. Prague public transport is rare exception. Buses, trams and subway trains arrive with minimal deviation from planned arrival time usually in seconds. I believe that there is sophisticated simulation software behind this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to simplify the task let’s presume that it is not about money. We are not going to optimize costs and incomes. The purpose of this simulation is to optimize:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Numbers of transportation units (TU) needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Frequency of releasing TUs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	their arrival time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All stated above in order to prevent people queueing on public transportation stops and to prevent transportation units from crowding.&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft Excel and SimProcess if needed will be used to perform this simulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Please, try to obtain real data. '''Approved'''. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:05, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Social media post (Amelievh) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Simulations on social media are typically problematic, mostly due to the lack of real data. I would recommend to try finding, something else. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:11, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''New proposal: gender pay gap'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is a difficult problem to solve because it is caused by different reasons (education, age, part-time working ...). These are main reasons, but all these reasons are influenced by other aspects and factors.I want to simulate these different reasons + influences in Vensim and work out the most effective solutions to reduce the pay gap. I would specify on 1 country because data is different per country. Easiest and most interesting for me is Belgium.&lt;br /&gt;
:: What particular literature and data will you base it on? [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 12:07, 15 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
I wrote a paper on this topic for another course wherefore I found a lot of statistical data. The EU publishes statistical data about this topic and reasons for it. I came up with the idea after seeing the Vensim example of SchoolLife which also showed a lot of influence on your future career. Only googling 'Gender Pay Gap Belgium' give you already a lot of publications and statistical information on this topic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation Proposal (A_V) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We own a zoo. We have a huge kennel for hamsters. We have observed a strange behavior of the hamsters. When a female hamster gives birth to babies (usually up to 12), the mother may come under the pressure of nurturing each and everyone of them. After giving the birth a female hamster becomes weak and may die if does not have enough food and vitamins. Also when the mother is weak, she can not lactate milk for all of her babies. Since the quality of food provided by the zoo does not always satisfy the hamster, the mother eats her weakest babies to get extra protein  to feed other babies, which increases the probability of survival of her and the rest babies. Another reason of the deaths of hamsters, as mentioned above, is the adequate quality of food. If the food does not satisfy the hamsters, they do not eat it and the food rots  by polluting the kernel which leads to an increased number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
In the simulation I will focus on how much the food quality, the amount of food and keeping the kernel clean influences the number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Makes sense, however it is necessary to obtain real data. Implementation of some of them will not be easy. '''Approved'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation proposal (hram00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagine a beach by the ocean guarded by several lifeguards. The warmer the ocean is, the more jellyfish come. If there is a lot of jellyfish in the water, people often get stung. If they get proper treatment in less then five minutes, the pain goes away quickly end they can enjoy the day on the beach. Otherwise they're mad for the rest of the day. In case someone is alergic, the situation can get critical.&lt;br /&gt;
My simulation should serve as a support for decision how many lifeguard should be placed on the beach and how far from each other to provide the best services and ensure the highest satisfaction of people on the beach and make sure no one will die because of jellyfish sting.&lt;br /&gt;
The Simulation will be simplified but based on reality. There are no real data about number of jellyfish in the water but there are data about number of people stung every day. Based on current experience I can make a simulation which is close to reality. So far there is one lifeguard each 200 meters, at the begining of the season when the water is cold 70 F there is 0-2 people stung in one lifeguard's area, in the hot days by the end of the season (water has about 85 F) the numbers of people stung on each lifeguard stand go up to 100 a day and we know there are cases that it took too long to get help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hub airport (yaua00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I study not in my home country I have to use plane quite often to get home and sometimes I have to go to a hub airport and change the plane there. So in my simulation I want to show the phenomenon of hub airports. Hub airports are used by one or more airlines to concentrate passenger traffic and flight operations at a given airport. They serve as transfer (or stop-over) points to get passengers to their final destination. The simulation will start with the certain amount of the airports and airplanes will appear at random locations. Airplanes will find a random airport and fly to it, leaving trails on screen to show their paths. Over time new airport and a new airplane will be built. The airports that have existed for the longest will obviously already have the greatest number of airplanes flying to them, but the goal of the simulation is to see when over some time after new airports are built, if the new airport is going to get more planes and if there is going to be new hub airport.  [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 23:21, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government Policies and Its Influence to Economy (xbilr00)==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to simulate an impact of government decision to a economy. The government will have few tools which can be fully influenced by political decisions (government spending, tax rates etc.). Based on this I will simulate an impact of these decisions to economic indicators (GDP growth, state budget incomes, inflation, state budget saldo etc.). This simulation should reflect a great complexity of each decision and its impact even to indicators which you will not imagine on the first sight.&lt;br /&gt;
::This is very complex - the simulation has to make sense so the question is what particular literature and particular models will you base it on? [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 20:46, 14 December 2017 (CET)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13902</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13902"/>
		<updated>2017-12-14T15:48:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Simulation Proposal (feld00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to simulate a public transport system. The idea came from travelling around Europe, being surprised how often public transport systems fail in large cities and still they are very expensive. Prague public transport is rare exception. Buses, trams and subway trains arrive with minimal deviation from planned arrival time usually in seconds. I believe that there is sophisticated simulation software behind this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to simplify the task let’s presume that it is not about money. We are not going to optimize costs and incomes. The purpose of this simulation is to optimize:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Numbers of transportation units (TU) needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Frequency of releasing TUs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	their arrival time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All stated above in order to prevent people queueing on public transportation stops and to prevent transportation units from crowding.&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft Excel and SimProcess if needed will be used to perform this simulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Please, try to obtain real data. '''Approved'''. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:05, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Social media post (Amelievh) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Simulations on social media are typically problematic, mostly due to the lack of real data. I would recommend to try finding, something else. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:11, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''New proposal: gender pay gap'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is a difficult problem to solve because it is caused by different reasons (education, age, part-time working ...). These are main reasons, but all these reasons are influenced by other aspects and factors.I want to simulate these different reasons + influences in Vensim and work out the most effective solutions to reduce the pay gap. I would specify on 1 country because data is different per country. Easiest and most interesting for me is Belgium.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation Proposal (A_V) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We own a zoo. We have a huge kennel for hamsters. We have observed a strange behavior of the hamsters. When a female hamster gives birth to babies (usually up to 12), the mother may come under the pressure of nurturing each and everyone of them. After giving the birth a female hamster becomes weak and may die if does not have enough food and vitamins. Also when the mother is weak, she can not lactate milk for all of her babies. Since the quality of food provided by the zoo does not always satisfy the hamster, the mother eats her weakest babies to get extra protein  to feed other babies, which increases the probability of survival of her and the rest babies. Another reason of the deaths of hamsters, as mentioned above, is the adequate quality of food. If the food does not satisfy the hamsters, they do not eat it and the food rots  by polluting the kernel which leads to an increased number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
In the simulation I will focus on how much the food quality, the amount of food and keeping the kernel clean influences the number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Makes sense, however it is necessary to obtain real data. Implementation of some of them will not be easy. '''Approved'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation proposal (hram00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagine a beach by the ocean guarded by several lifeguards. The warmer the ocean is, the more jellyfish come. If there is a lot of jellyfish in the water, people often get stung. If they get proper treatment in less then five minutes, the pain goes away quickly end they can enjoy the day on the beach. Otherwise they're mad for the rest of the day. In case someone is alergic, the situation can get critical.&lt;br /&gt;
My simulation should serve as a support for decision how many lifeguard should be placed on the beach and how far from each other to provide the best services and ensure the highest satisfaction of people on the beach and make sure no one will die because of jellyfish sting.&lt;br /&gt;
The Simulation will be simplified but based on reality. There are no real data about number of jellyfish in the water but there are data about number of people stung every day. Based on current experience I can make a simulation which is close to reality. So far there is one lifeguard each 200 meters, at the begining of the season when the water is cold 70 F there is 0-2 people stung in one lifeguard's area, in the hot days by the end of the season (water has about 85 F) the numbers of people stung on each lifeguard stand go up to 100 a day and we know there are cases that it took too long to get help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hub airport (yaua00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I study not in my home country I have to use plane quite often to get home and sometimes I have to go to a hub airport and change the plane there. So in my simulation I want to show the phenomenon of hub airports. Hub airports are used by one or more airlines to concentrate passenger traffic and flight operations at a given airport. They serve as transfer (or stop-over) points to get passengers to their final destination. The simulation will start with the certain amount of the airports and airplanes will appear at random locations. Airplanes will find a random airport and fly to it, leaving trails on screen to show their paths. Over time new airport and a new airplane will be built. The airports that have existed for the longest will obviously already have the greatest number of airplanes flying to them, but the goal of the simulation is to see when over some time after new airports are built, if the new airport is going to get more planes and if there is going to be new hub airport.  [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 23:21, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government Policies and Its Influence to Economy (xbilr00)==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to simulate an impact of government decision to a economy. The government will have few tools which can be fully influenced by political decisions (government spending, tax rates etc.). Based on this I will simulate an impact of these decisions to economic indicators (GDP growth, state budget incomes, inflation, state budget saldo etc.). This simulation should reflect a great complexity of each decision and its impact even to indicators which you will not imagine on the first sight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13901</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13901"/>
		<updated>2017-12-14T15:48:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Simulation Proposal (feld00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to simulate a public transport system. The idea came from travelling around Europe, being surprised how often public transport systems fail in large cities and still they are very expensive. Prague public transport is rare exception. Buses, trams and subway trains arrive with minimal deviation from planned arrival time usually in seconds. I believe that there is sophisticated simulation software behind this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to simplify the task let’s presume that it is not about money. We are not going to optimize costs and incomes. The purpose of this simulation is to optimize:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Numbers of transportation units (TU) needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Frequency of releasing TUs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	their arrival time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All stated above in order to prevent people queueing on public transportation stops and to prevent transportation units from crowding.&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft Excel and SimProcess if needed will be used to perform this simulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Please, try to obtain real data. '''Approved'''. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:05, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Social media post (Amelievh) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Simulations on social media are typically problematic, mostly due to the lack of real data. I would recommend to try finding, something else. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:11, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''New proposal: gender pay gap'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is a difficult problem to solve because it is caused by different reasons (education, age, part-time working ...). These are main reasons, but all these reasons are influenced by other aspects and factors.I want to simulate these different reasons + influences in Vensim and work out the most effective solutions to reduce the pay gap. I would specify on 1 country because data is different per country. Easiest and most interesting for me is Belgium.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation Proposal (A_V) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We own a zoo. We have a huge kennel for hamsters. We have observed a strange behavior of the hamsters. When a female hamster gives birth to babies (usually up to 12), the mother may come under the pressure of nurturing each and everyone of them. After giving the birth a female hamster becomes weak and may die if does not have enough food and vitamins. Also when the mother is weak, she can not lactate milk for all of her babies. Since the quality of food provided by the zoo does not always satisfy the hamster, the mother eats her weakest babies to get extra protein  to feed other babies, which increases the probability of survival of her and the rest babies. Another reason of the deaths of hamsters, as mentioned above, is the adequate quality of food. If the food does not satisfy the hamsters, they do not eat it and the food rots  by polluting the kernel which leads to an increased number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
In the simulation I will focus on how much the food quality, the amount of food and keeping the kernel clean influences the number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Makes sense, however it is necessary to obtain real data. Implementation of some of them will not be easy. '''Approved'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation proposal (hram00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagine a beach by the ocean guarded by several lifeguards. The warmer the ocean is, the more jellyfish come. If there is a lot of jellyfish in the water, people often get stung. If they get proper treatment in less then five minutes, the pain goes away quickly end they can enjoy the day on the beach. Otherwise they're mad for the rest of the day. In case someone is alergic, the situation can get critical.&lt;br /&gt;
My simulation should serve as a support for decision how many lifeguard should be placed on the beach and how far from each other to provide the best services and ensure the highest satisfaction of people on the beach and make sure no one will die because of jellyfish sting.&lt;br /&gt;
The Simulation will be simplified but based on reality. There are no real data about number of jellyfish in the water but there are data about number of people stung every day. Based on current experience I can make a simulation which is close to reality. So far there is one lifeguard each 200 meters, at the begining of the season when the water is cold 70 F there is 0-2 people stung in one lifeguard's area, in the hot days by the end of the season (water has about 85 F) the numbers of people stung on each lifeguard stand go up to 100 a day and we know there are cases that it took too long to get help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hub airport (yaua00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I study not in my home country I have to use plane quite often to get home and sometimes I have to go to a hub airport and change the plane there. So in my simulation I want to show the phenomenon of hub airports. Hub airports are used by one or more airlines to concentrate passenger traffic and flight operations at a given airport. They serve as transfer (or stop-over) points to get passengers to their final destination. The simulation will start with the certain amount of the airports and airplanes will appear at random locations. Airplanes will find a random airport and fly to it, leaving trails on screen to show their paths. Over time new airport and a new airplane will be built. The airports that have existed for the longest will obviously already have the greatest number of airplanes flying to them, but the goal of the simulation is to see when over some time after new airports are built, if the new airport is going to get more planes and if there is going to be new hub airport.  [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 23:21, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government Policies and Its Influence to Economy (xbilr00)==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to simulate an impact of government decision to a economy. The government will have few tools which can be fully influenced by political decisions (government spending, tax rates etc.). Based on this I will simulate an impact of these decisions to economic indicators (GDP growth, state budget incomes, inflation, state budget saldo etc.). This simulation should reflect a great complexity of each decision and its impact even to indicators which you will not imagine on the first sight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13900</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13900"/>
		<updated>2017-12-14T15:47:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Simulation Proposal (feld00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to simulate a public transport system. The idea came from travelling around Europe, being surprised how often public transport systems fail in large cities and still they are very expensive. Prague public transport is rare exception. Buses, trams and subway trains arrive with minimal deviation from planned arrival time usually in seconds. I believe that there is sophisticated simulation software behind this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to simplify the task let’s presume that it is not about money. We are not going to optimize costs and incomes. The purpose of this simulation is to optimize:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Numbers of transportation units (TU) needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Frequency of releasing TUs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	their arrival time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All stated above in order to prevent people queueing on public transportation stops and to prevent transportation units from crowding.&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft Excel and SimProcess if needed will be used to perform this simulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Please, try to obtain real data. '''Approved'''. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:05, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Social media post (Amelievh) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Simulations on social media are typically problematic, mostly due to the lack of real data. I would recommend to try finding, something else. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:11, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''New proposal: gender pay gap'''&lt;br /&gt;
The gender pay gap is a difficult problem to solve because it is caused by different reasons (education, age, part-time working ...). These are main reasons, but all these reasons are influenced by other aspects and factors.I want to simulate these different reasons + influences in Vensim and work out the most effective solutions to reduce the pay gap. I would specify on 1 country because data is different per country. Easiest and most interesting for me is Belgium.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation Proposal (A_V) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We own a zoo. We have a huge kennel for hamsters. We have observed a strange behavior of the hamsters. When a female hamster gives birth to babies (usually up to 12), the mother may come under the pressure of nurturing each and everyone of them. After giving the birth a female hamster becomes weak and may die if does not have enough food and vitamins. Also when the mother is weak, she can not lactate milk for all of her babies. Since the quality of food provided by the zoo does not always satisfy the hamster, the mother eats her weakest babies to get extra protein  to feed other babies, which increases the probability of survival of her and the rest babies. Another reason of the deaths of hamsters, as mentioned above, is the adequate quality of food. If the food does not satisfy the hamsters, they do not eat it and the food rots  by polluting the kernel which leads to an increased number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
In the simulation I will focus on how much the food quality, the amount of food and keeping the kernel clean influences the number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Makes sense, however it is necessary to obtain real data. Implementation of some of them will not be easy. '''Approved'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation proposal (hram00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagine a beach by the ocean guarded by several lifeguards. The warmer the ocean is, the more jellyfish come. If there is a lot of jellyfish in the water, people often get stung. If they get proper treatment in less then five minutes, the pain goes away quickly end they can enjoy the day on the beach. Otherwise they're mad for the rest of the day. In case someone is alergic, the situation can get critical.&lt;br /&gt;
My simulation should serve as a support for decision how many lifeguard should be placed on the beach and how far from each other to provide the best services and ensure the highest satisfaction of people on the beach and make sure no one will die because of jellyfish sting.&lt;br /&gt;
The Simulation will be simplified but based on reality. There are no real data about number of jellyfish in the water but there are data about number of people stung every day. Based on current experience I can make a simulation which is close to reality. So far there is one lifeguard each 200 meters, at the begining of the season when the water is cold 70 F there is 0-2 people stung in one lifeguard's area, in the hot days by the end of the season (water has about 85 F) the numbers of people stung on each lifeguard stand go up to 100 a day and we know there are cases that it took too long to get help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hub airport (yaua00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I study not in my home country I have to use plane quite often to get home and sometimes I have to go to a hub airport and change the plane there. So in my simulation I want to show the phenomenon of hub airports. Hub airports are used by one or more airlines to concentrate passenger traffic and flight operations at a given airport. They serve as transfer (or stop-over) points to get passengers to their final destination. The simulation will start with the certain amount of the airports and airplanes will appear at random locations. Airplanes will find a random airport and fly to it, leaving trails on screen to show their paths. Over time new airport and a new airplane will be built. The airports that have existed for the longest will obviously already have the greatest number of airplanes flying to them, but the goal of the simulation is to see when over some time after new airports are built, if the new airport is going to get more planes and if there is going to be new hub airport.  [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 23:21, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government Policies and Its Influence to Economy (xbilr00)==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to simulate an impact of government decision to a economy. The government will have few tools which can be fully influenced by political decisions (government spending, tax rates etc.). Based on this I will simulate an impact of these decisions to economic indicators (GDP growth, state budget incomes, inflation, state budget saldo etc.). This simulation should reflect a great complexity of each decision and its impact even to indicators which you will not imagine on the first sight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13899</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13899"/>
		<updated>2017-12-14T15:25:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Simulation Proposal (feld00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to simulate a public transport system. The idea came from travelling around Europe, being surprised how often public transport systems fail in large cities and still they are very expensive. Prague public transport is rare exception. Buses, trams and subway trains arrive with minimal deviation from planned arrival time usually in seconds. I believe that there is sophisticated simulation software behind this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to simplify the task let’s presume that it is not about money. We are not going to optimize costs and incomes. The purpose of this simulation is to optimize:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Numbers of transportation units (TU) needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Frequency of releasing TUs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	their arrival time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All stated above in order to prevent people queueing on public transportation stops and to prevent transportation units from crowding.&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft Excel and SimProcess if needed will be used to perform this simulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Please, try to obtain real data. '''Approved'''. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:05, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Social media post (Amelievh) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Simulations on social media are typically problematic, mostly due to the lack of real data. I would recommend to try finding, something else. [[User:Tomáš|Tomáš]] ([[User talk:Tomáš|talk]]) 04:11, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation Proposal (A_V) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We own a zoo. We have a huge kennel for hamsters. We have observed a strange behavior of the hamsters. When a female hamster gives birth to babies (usually up to 12), the mother may come under the pressure of nurturing each and everyone of them. After giving the birth a female hamster becomes weak and may die if does not have enough food and vitamins. Also when the mother is weak, she can not lactate milk for all of her babies. Since the quality of food provided by the zoo does not always satisfy the hamster, the mother eats her weakest babies to get extra protein  to feed other babies, which increases the probability of survival of her and the rest babies. Another reason of the deaths of hamsters, as mentioned above, is the adequate quality of food. If the food does not satisfy the hamsters, they do not eat it and the food rots  by polluting the kernel which leads to an increased number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
In the simulation I will focus on how much the food quality, the amount of food and keeping the kernel clean influences the number of hamster deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Makes sense, however it is necessary to obtain real data. Implementation of some of them will not be easy. '''Approved'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simulation proposal (hram00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagine a beach by the ocean guarded by several lifeguards. The warmer the ocean is, the more jellyfish come. If there is a lot of jellyfish in the water, people often get stung. If they get proper treatment in less then five minutes, the pain goes away quickly end they can enjoy the day on the beach. Otherwise they're mad for the rest of the day. In case someone is alergic, the situation can get critical.&lt;br /&gt;
My simulation should serve as a support for decision how many lifeguard should be placed on the beach and how far from each other to provide the best services and ensure the highest satisfaction of people on the beach and make sure no one will die because of jellyfish sting.&lt;br /&gt;
The Simulation will be simplified but based on reality. There are no real data about number of jellyfish in the water but there are data about number of people stung every day. Based on current experience I can make a simulation which is close to reality. So far there is one lifeguard each 200 meters, at the begining of the season when the water is cold 70 F there is 0-2 people stung in one lifeguard's area, in the hot days by the end of the season (water has about 85 F) the numbers of people stung on each lifeguard stand go up to 100 a day and we know there are cases that it took too long to get help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hub airport (yaua00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I study not in my home country I have to use plane quite often to get home and sometimes I have to go to a hub airport and change the plane there. So in my simulation I want to show the phenomenon of hub airports. Hub airports are used by one or more airlines to concentrate passenger traffic and flight operations at a given airport. They serve as transfer (or stop-over) points to get passengers to their final destination. The simulation will start with the certain amount of the airports and airplanes will appear at random locations. Airplanes will find a random airport and fly to it, leaving trails on screen to show their paths. Over time new airport and a new airplane will be built. The airports that have existed for the longest will obviously already have the greatest number of airplanes flying to them, but the goal of the simulation is to see when over some time after new airports are built, if the new airport is going to get more planes and if there is going to be new hub airport.  [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 23:21, 12 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government Policies and Its Influence to Economy (xbilr00)==&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to simulate an impact of government decision to a economy. The government will have few tools which can be fully influenced by political decisions (government spending, tax rates etc.). Based on this I will simulate an impact of these decisions to economic indicators (GDP growth, state budget incomes, inflation, state budget saldo etc.). This simulation should reflect a great complexity of each decision and its impact even to indicators which you will not imagine on the first sight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13879</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13879"/>
		<updated>2017-12-10T20:31:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bars in a concert hall serving a dance event (yaua00)  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None party exists without alcohol, so let’s imagine a dance event in a concert hall Lucerna with 2 bars and in the concert hall. People during a dance event are randomly distributed along 1300 m^2. Prices are regulated by the owner of the concert hall, so they are equal for each bar. This fact means, that people choose to which bar to go considering just the distance, this also means that both should have almost the same profit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But one greedy owner of one of the bars wants to have greater profit then the other one by moving to another position and attracting customers in such a way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more question of this simulation would be – what would happen if more people open their bars there (luckily the size of the hall allows it) and they bring their own prices to the concert hall, so the people can now choose not only the distance to the bar, but also the price of their favorites drinks. [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 22:46, 9 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Social media post (Amelievh) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13878</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13878"/>
		<updated>2017-12-10T20:31:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bars in a concert hall serving a dance event (yaua00)  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None party exists without alcohol, so let’s imagine a dance event in a concert hall Lucerna with 2 bars and in the concert hall. People during a dance event are randomly distributed along 1300 m^2. Prices are regulated by the owner of the concert hall, so they are equal for each bar. This fact means, that people choose to which bar to go considering just the distance, this also means that both should have almost the same profit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But one greedy owner of one of the bars wants to have greater profit then the other one by moving to another position and attracting customers in such a way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more question of this simulation would be – what would happen if more people open their bars there (luckily the size of the hall allows it) and they bring their own prices to the concert hall, so the people can now choose not only the distance to the bar, but also the price of their favorites drinks. [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 22:46, 9 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Social media post (Amelievh) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world. ([[User talk: Amelievh talk]]) 21:30, 10 December 2017 (CET)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13877</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13877"/>
		<updated>2017-12-10T20:29:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bars in a concert hall serving a dance event (yaua00)  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None party exists without alcohol, so let’s imagine a dance event in a concert hall Lucerna with 2 bars and in the concert hall. People during a dance event are randomly distributed along 1300 m^2. Prices are regulated by the owner of the concert hall, so they are equal for each bar. This fact means, that people choose to which bar to go considering just the distance, this also means that both should have almost the same profit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But one greedy owner of one of the bars wants to have greater profit then the other one by moving to another position and attracting customers in such a way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more question of this simulation would be – what would happen if more people open their bars there (luckily the size of the hall allows it) and they bring their own prices to the concert hall, so the people can now choose not only the distance to the bar, but also the price of their favorites drinks. [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 22:46, 9 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Social media post (Amelievh) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13876</id>
		<title>Assignments WS 2017/2018</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.simulace.info/index.php?title=Assignments_WS_2017/2018&amp;diff=13876"/>
		<updated>2017-12-10T20:28:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Amelievh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Simulation Proposal (xvatj00) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Vensim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a contemporary gospel choir conductor (choir and full professional band). We organize more or less 3 concerts a year. It has been a long time since we released our last CD and now we would like to earn money to be able to start recording a new one. For this purpose, I would like to find out those factors (such as choir performance, band performance, tickets’ price, concert’s location, etc.) that influence potential audience when choosing a band to go see and how to improve them, and thus get more people to come to our concerts - and earn more money for the tickets and in general. I will use a survey to get data about people’s preferences.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 17:45, 27 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::For this kind of simulation you would need ritch historical data so that you would be able to find premises you would then build the equations on (and to be able to verify the model when you compare its results with the historical data). Unfortunately the survey will not help you to quantify the parameters and the number of concerts is really low to be usable for such simulation. I probabbly would suggest a different topic. [[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 18:43, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can get data up to 10 years back. The number of concerts included only those concert that are organized by us only, but we perform in many other concerts as well. Do you have any suggestions how to make the simulation possible? Thank you. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:59, 30 November 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You would have to be able to define parameters that determine the demand for the individual concerts, and based on the data quantify them and quantify their impact on the demand for a concert. Based on that one could then discuss how the concert and its content should be se up so that you get maximum profit out of it. That is not a really easy ...[[User:Oleg.Svatos|Oleg.Svatos]] ([[User talk:Oleg.Svatos|talk]]) 15:07, 6 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intersection Optimalization (NEW ASSIGNMENT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every day, I walk by the intersection of Anglická and Bělehradská / Škrétova. During peak hours, there are traffic jams on only one street leading to the intersection, which I find interesting. Because of this fact, I would like to simulate the intersection in order to find out if the lights are really optimally set there, and potentially, find out the optimal setting of the intersection’s lights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I’ve already mentioned, there are lights directing the intersection. Also, there is a tram track on the Bělehradská / Škrétova street which goes straight, while most of the cars coming from Bělehradská street turn left. I will use real intervals of all of the lights from a chosen time during peak hours, and the number of cars and trams coming to the intersection (including their speed, direction, etc.). At first, I will set the lights to constant ticks according to the reality to simulate the real situation. After that, I will try to find out an optimal setting of the lights and evaluate, what the optimal setting is or if it meets with the reality. [[User:Xvatj00|Xvatj00]] ([[User talk:Xvatj00|talk]]) 18:48, 8 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bars in a concert hall serving a dance event (yaua00)  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: NetLogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None party exists without alcohol, so let’s imagine a dance event in a concert hall Lucerna with 2 bars and in the concert hall. People during a dance event are randomly distributed along 1300 m^2. Prices are regulated by the owner of the concert hall, so they are equal for each bar. This fact means, that people choose to which bar to go considering just the distance, this also means that both should have almost the same profit.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But one greedy owner of one of the bars wants to have greater profit then the other one by moving to another position and attracting customers in such a way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more question of this simulation would be – what would happen if more people open their bars there (luckily the size of the hall allows it) and they bring their own prices to the concert hall, so the people can now choose not only the distance to the bar, but also the price of their favorites drinks. [[User:Yaua00|Yaua00]] ([[User talk:Yaua00|talk]]) 22:46, 9 December 2017 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[['''Social media post (Amelievh''']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software: Netlogo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nowadays social media is a hot topic, and a lot of recruiters and other business people use linked in to attract new employees or just to share their thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For my simulation, I was thinking about researching the reach of a social media post. Someone posts something on LinkedIn, and depending on the amount of connection and amount of sharing I want to check how many people you can reach with one post. I will try to find real-world numbers and make it a useful tool for the business world.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Amelievh</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>