Flood evacuation - Revision history

Xgubk00: /* References */

2015-01-18T22:57:30Z

‎References

Xgubk00: /* Conclusion */

2015-01-18T22:57:15Z

‎Conclusion

Xgubk00: /* Results */

2015-01-18T22:52:10Z

‎Results

Xgubk00: /* Results */

2015-01-18T22:45:06Z

‎Results

Xgubk00: /* Results */

2015-01-18T22:43:12Z

‎Results

Xgubk00: /* Results */

2015-01-18T22:30:47Z

‎Results

Xgubk00: /* Results */

2015-01-18T22:26:32Z

‎Results

Xgubk00: /* Results */

2015-01-18T22:25:55Z

‎Results

Xgubk00: /* Results */

2015-01-18T22:22:59Z

‎Results

Xgubk00: /* Results */

2015-01-18T22:22:05Z

‎Results

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 18 January 2015
Line 136:		Line 136:
	=References=		=References=
	<references/>		<references/>
		+
		+	--[[User:Xgubk00\|Xgubk00]] 23:57, 18 January 2015 (CET)

@@ Line 119: / Line 119: @@
 = Conclusion=
-A lots of people who are currently on the beaches will die, because they have not much time to react.
+I can say that the simulation almost allways depends on the simulated environment, in which part of the world are hills generated, and how spread they are, and of course the simulation depends on the number of people generated in every each simulation.
-In this flood evacuation simulation there is the terrain randomly generated. But this model can be applied on any other real country, there is only need to add real data like the map with altitudes and of course population of the area.
+A lots of people who are during the flood currently on the beaches will die, because they have not much time to react.
 =Other resources=

@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 I conducted a research where there were 3 experiments, we can call them extremes.
-) At the first elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 400, number of people to 800 and their visibility to 50. The first picture is before the simulation and the second one is after the simulation. In those conditions the number of dead people was 66 from 800, so because the flood height was "just 400", so 734 people survived. We can say the mortality is low. The mortality rate was in this case 8,25 %.
+) At the first elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 400, number of people to 800 and their visibility to 50. The first picture is before the simulation and the second one is after the simulation. In those conditions the number of dead people was 66 of 800, so because the flood height was "just 400", so 734 people survived. We can say the mortality is low. The mortality rate was in this case 8,25 %. The most of the land stayed dry, that is why a lots of people managed to get to safety.
 [[File:1before.png]]
 [[File:1after.png]]
-) At the second elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 500, number of people to 1300 and their visibility to 60. Again the first picture shows the simulation before the flood, and the second one is acquired after the simulation. In these conditions the number of dead people was 80 from 1300 and 1220 people survived. We can say that in that conditions the mortality is low. The mortality rate was in this case 6,15 %.
+) At the second elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 500, number of people to 1300 and their visibility to 60. Again the first picture shows the simulation before the flood, and the second one is acquired after the simulation. In these conditions the number of dead people was 80 of 1300 and 1220 people survived. We can say that in that conditions the mortality is low. The mortality rate was in this case 6,15 %. The flood was rapidly higher than the first one, but a lots of people managed to get to safety.
 [[File:2before.png]]
 [[File:2after.png]]
-) At the third elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 650, number of people to 1800 and their visibility to 70. The first picture is captured before simulation and the second one is after the simulation. In those conditions the number of dead people reached to 1266 from the total 1800 people and 534 people survived. The mortality rate is in this case 70%, which is crutual. Possible explanation of those high numbers is that the flood was critically high and the visibility was 70 and people were willing to take risks to get higher in order to save their lives.
+) At the third elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 650, number of people to 1800 and their visibility to 70. The first picture is captured before simulation and the second one is after the simulation. In those conditions the number of dead people reached to 1266 of the total 1800 people and 534 people survived. The mortality rate is in this case 70%, which is crutual. Possible explanation of those high numbers is that the flood was critically high and the visibility was 70 and people were willing to take risks to get higher in order to save their lives. The highest places was on the borders of the world and that is why the way to the safety was long.
 [[File:3before.png]]

@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 I conducted a research where there were 3 experiments, we can call them extremes.
-) At the first elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 400, number of people to 800 and their visibility to 50. The first picture is before the simulation and the second one is after the simulation. In those conditions the number of dead people was 66 from 800, so because the flood height was "just 400" 734 people survived. We can say the mortality is low. The mortality rate was in this case 8,25 %.
+) At the first elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 400, number of people to 800 and their visibility to 50. The first picture is before the simulation and the second one is after the simulation. In those conditions the number of dead people was 66 from 800, so because the flood height was "just 400", so 734 people survived. We can say the mortality is low. The mortality rate was in this case 8,25 %.
 [[File:1before.png]]

@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 I conducted a research where there were 3 experiments, we can call them extremes.
-) At the first simulation I setup the height of the flood to 400, number of people to 800 and its visibility to 50. The first picture is before the simulation and the second one is after the simulation. In those conditions the number of dead people was 66 from 800, so because the flood height was "just 400" 734 people survived. We can say the mortality is low.
+) At the first elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 400, number of people to 800 and their visibility to 50. The first picture is before the simulation and the second one is after the simulation. In those conditions the number of dead people was 66 from 800, so because the flood height was "just 400" 734 people survived. We can say the mortality is low. The mortality rate was in this case 8,25 %.
 [[File:1before.png]]
 [[File:1after.png]]
-) At the second simulation I setup the height of the flood 500, number of people to 1300 and its visibility to 60. Again the first picture shows the simulation before the flood, and the second one is azquired after the simulation. In these conditions the number of dead people was 80 from 1300 and 1220 people survived. We can say that in that conditions the mortality is low.
+) At the second elapsed simulation I setup the height of the flood to 500, number of people to 1300 and their visibility to 60. Again the first picture shows the simulation before the flood, and the second one is acquired after the simulation. In these conditions the number of dead people was 80 from 1300 and 1220 people survived. We can say that in that conditions the mortality is low. The mortality rate was in this case 6,15 %.
 [[File:2before.png]]
 [[File:2after.png]]
 = Conclusion=

@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 = Results=
-I conducted a research where there were 3 experiments
+I conducted a research where there were 3 experiments, we can call them extremes.
 ) I setup the height of the flood to 400, number of people to 800 and its visibility to 50. The first picture is before the simulation and the second one is after the simulation. In those conditions the number of dead people was 66 from 800, so because the flood height was "just 400" 734 people survived.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 18 January 2015
Line 105:		Line 105:

	[[File:1before.png]]		[[File:1before.png]]
		+	[[File:1after.png]]

	= Conclusion=		= Conclusion=

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 18 January 2015
Line 103:		Line 103:

	1) I setup the height of the flood to 400, number of people to 800 and its visibility to 50.		1) I setup the height of the flood to 400, number of people to 800 and its visibility to 50.
		+
		+	[[File:1before.png]]

	= Conclusion=		= Conclusion=